Skip to main content

Code Set

You are viewing the Code Set for: lamulrem

Code Set Results: read below to better understand the type of data that populates the variables
LabelCodeDescription
"FILM ASSIGNED A ""Q"" PREFIX."075FILM ASSIGNED A Q PREFIX. THIS PREFIX DOES NOT APPEAR ON FILM BUT MERELY INDICATES A FILM WITH ONLY A NUMBER
(CYCOLAC BADGE) DENSITY BEYOND THE RANGE192(CYCOLAC BADGE) FILTER 20 DENSITY BEYOND THE RANGE OF THE DENSITOMETER. ARBITRARILY SET EQUAL TO FILTER 21
(OBS) HALF-LIFE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY DIFF096(OBSOLETE) HALF-LIFE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY ENOUGH DIFFERENT FROM NORMAL 12-DAY HALF-LIFE TO WARRANT CHANGE
(OBSOLETE) TRITIUM ELIMINATION PLOTTED030(OBSOLETE) TRITIUM ELIMINATION PLOTTED AND APPROPRIATE CORRECTION IN DOSAGE MADE
(OBSOLETE) TRITIUM EVALUATION CHANGED044(OBSOLETE) TRITIUM EVALUATION CHANGED TO 10-DAY ELIMINATION HALF-LIFE
(OBSOLETE) TRITIUM EXPOSURES CORRECTED074(OBSOLETE) TRITIUM EXPOSURES CORRECTED TO NEW PERMISSIABLE LEVEL OF CONSTANT BODY BURDEN OF 3.7 MC. (SUBTRACT EXPOSURE CORRESPONDING TO ( ) FOR FIRST OF THIRD QUARTER FROM SECOND QUARTER TOTAL. THEN START THIRD QUARTER AS NEW (ORIGINAL) SAMPLE FOR THAT PERSON
1045-1946 BACK RECORDS2881045-1946 BACK RECORDS - REFER TO MEMO DATED 10/06/78 IN PHOTODOSIMETRY EVALUATION BOOK, VOLUME II.
1948 BACK RECORDS2641948 BACK RECORDS - SPECIAL SECOND BADGE (RED) WORN DURING OPERATION AT OMEGA - SEE LA NOTEBOOK FOR DETAILS
555 COMPONENT FILM IS NOT IN PACKET211555 COMPONENT FILM IS NOT IN PACKET
555 OR TYPE 2 FILM MISSING FROM BADGE196555 OR TYPE 2 FILM MISSING FROM BADGE - UNABLE TO ACCOUNT FOR LOSS
8 BADGES LEFT IN DRAWER302MONTH OF APRIL 1979 THRU MAY 8 BADGES LEFT IN DRAWER NEAR D- 38 SCREWS - EXPOSURE REDUCED TO ZERO - SEE FILE DOSIMETRY INVESTIGATIONS BY H.P'S
A CALCULATED TRITIUM URINE ASSAY316A CALCULATED TRITIUM URINE ASSAY AS ENTERED FOR THE DATE ON WHICH THE EXPOSURE TOOK PLACE. SEE MEMO IN INCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE FILE
ACCIDENTAL EXPOSURE TO FILM005ACCIDENTAL EXPOSURE TO FILM AND NOT PERSON ISSUED FILM (ONLY IF EXPOSURE IS 0)
ACTUAL RETURN DATE IS ONE YEAR PRIOR146ACTUAL RETURN DATE IS ONE YEAR PRIOR TO THE DATE INDICATED ON THE IBM CARD (THIS IS DONE TO FACILITATE RECORD KEEPING)
ANOMOLIES2484/23/76. WHEN READING CERTAIN GROUPS OF FILM WORN DURING MARCH 1976, IT WAS NOTICED THAT CONSISTENT DENSITIES OF .01 TO .03 ON PERSONS WHO DO NOT NORMALLY RECEIVE EXPOSURES. INCONSISTENCIES IN THE FD-11 DENSITOMETER WERE ALSO OBSERVED AT THIS TIME. CONTROL WITH DENSITY OF .34 WAS LOWER THAT PERSONS DEVELOPING. D-DECK 008 WITH A DENSITY OF .36 WAS USED.
APPARENT OVER-EXPOSURE BALANCED035APPARENT OVER-EXPOSURE BALANCED FOLLOWING WEEK. NO OER SENT
ASSUMED NO THERMAL NEUTRONS305HAND EVALUATED EVMI ASSUMED NO THERMAL NEUTRONS
ASSUMED TO THERMAL NEUTRONS097ASSUMED TO THERMAL NEUTRONS - MACHINE SETS CADMIUM DENSITY EQUAL TO BRASS DENSITY AND THEN EVALUATES ROUTINELY. SHOULD THIS OCCUR, 704 WILL ENTER CODE 097 IN REMARK COLUMN. 704 WILL PREPARE AN ADDITIONAL CARD CARRYING 0 EXPOSURES BUT CONTAINING THE 097 REMARK
BADGE ACCIDENTALLY EXPOSED NOT ON WEARER197PECULIAR PATTERN ON FILM INVESTIGATED - BADGE ACCIDENTALLY EXPOSED WHILE NOT ON WEARER. HOWEVER, WEARER WILL BE ATTRIBUTED WITH EXPOSURE CORRESPONDING TO F 21 & OW DENSITIES AS MEASURED WITH THE ANSCO DENSITOMETER
BADGE CONTAMINATED234BADGE CONTAMINATED - COULD NOT BE RETURNED FOR PROCESSING (SEE LOST BADGE CARD FOR DETAILS OR LA NOTEBOOK)
BADGE CONTAMINATED IN OPEN WINDOW AREA.239BADGE CONTAMINATED IN OPEN WINDOW AREA. FILTER 20 AREA USED FOR EVALUATION
BADGE DISCONTINUED198BADGE DISCONTINUED - TRANSFERRED TO GROUP WHICH IS NOT ROUTINELY BADGED
BADGE DISCONTINUED200BADGE DISCONTINUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR DISTRIBUTING THE BADGE (USUALLY THE GROUP SECRETARY)
BADGE DISCONTINUED201BADGE DISCONTINUED AT THE REQUEST OF THE WEARER'S SUPERVISOR OR GROUP LEADER
BADGE DISCONTINUED202BADGE DISCONTINUED AT THE REQUEST OF A MEMBER OF THE HEALTH PHYSICS GROUP
BADGE DISCONTINUED AT WEARER'S REQUEST199BADGE DISCONTINUED AT WEARER'S REQUEST
BADGE EXPOSED AT AN ANGLE256BADGE EXPOSED AT AN ANGLE TO INCIDENT RADIATION. DUE TO DENSITY PATTERNS, F20 DENSITY WAS USED FOR THE THREE AREAS. READ ON THE ANSCO DENSITOMETER.
BADGE EXPOSED AT ANGLE214BADGE WAS EXPOSED AT AN ANGLE TO THE INCIDENT - RADIATION - DENSITIES HAD TO BE MEASURED ON THE ANSCO DENSITOMETER
BADGE EXPOSED TO HEAT AND MEDICAL X-RAYS.280BADGE EXPOSED TO HEAT AND MEDICAL X-RAYS. WEARER ASSIGNED WITH A SIMILAR EXPOSURE AS HIS CO-WORKER
BADGE EXPOSED TO HEAT AND RADIATION.258FILM BADGE EXPOSED TO A COMBINATION OF HEAT AND RADIATION. PERSON ASSIGNED WITH ESTIMATED EXPOSURE. DETAILS ARE CONTAINED IN THE INVESTIGATION REPORT
BADGE EXPOSED TO HEAT.251BADGE EXPOSED TO HEAT. EXPOSURE ESTIMATE FROM POCKET DOSIMETER
BADGE ISSUED WITHOUT BEING SCANNED357A TLD BADGE WAS INADVERTENTLY ISSUED FOR USE IN THE FIELD WITHOUT BEING SCANNED AND WITHOUT HAVING A TLD CARD INSIDE. THE ASSIGNED EXPOSURE IS BASED ON PAST EXPOSURE HISTORY AND ON INFORMATION FROM THE HP'S AND/OR HPT'S IN THE RESPECTIVE AREAS. MEMO IN PHOTO DOSIMETRY INCIDENT FILE EXPLAINS DETAILS. 3/27/92
BADGE ISSUED WITHOUT FILM PACKETS.228BADGE INADVERTENTLY ISSUED WITHOUT FILM PACKETS. EXPOSURE AS RECORDED WAS ESTIMATED BY THE WEARER.
BADGE LEFT IN EXPERIMENTAL AREA307BADGE WEARER INADVERTENTLY LEFT BADGE IN EXPERIMENTAL AREA OR OTHER SOURCE. INDIVIDUAL WAS ATTRIBUTED THE EXPOSURE INDICATED BY THE DOSIMETER BADGE OR INDIVIDUALS PAST EXPOSURE HISTORY. REF. MEMO FOR THIS INDIVIDUAL IN INCIDENT FILE
BADGE LOST OR STORED IN RADIATION AREA314THE BADGE WAS LOST OR STORED IN A RADIATION AREA AND FOUND AT A LATER TIME. THE INDICATED EXPOSURE IS NOT THAT BELIEVED TO BE RECEIVED BY WEARER. FOR EXPLANATION OF RECORDED EXPOSURE, SEE MEMO IN INCIDENT FILE.
BADGE LOST UNDER A HOOD AT DP WEST226BADGE LOST UNDER A HOOD AT DP WEST FOR AN UNKNOWN PERIOD OF TIME. INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNED EXPOSURE AS MEASURED BY THE FILM
BADGE NOT ISSUED WHERE EXPOSURE OCCURRED098FILM BADGE NOT ISSUED AT SITE WHERE EXPOSURE OCCURRED
BADGE NOT PLANTED IN THE NORMAL MANNER.178BADGE WAS NOT PLANTED IN THE NORMAL MANNER. EXPOSURE WAS DETERMINED BY A HAND EVALUATION AND VERBALLY RELAYED TO THE EXPERIMENTER
BADGE ORIGINALLY REPORTED AS LOST (055)137BADGE ORIGINALLY REPORTED AS LOST (055). IBM CARD WITH (055) WAS RETAINED IN FILE AND MAY HAVE BEEN HAND EVALUATED. (CODE ALSO APPLIED TO A PREVIOUSLY REPORTED CODE 133)
BADGE PROCESSED AND HAND EVALUATED263BADGE PROCESSED AND HAND EVALUATED PRIOR TO THE NORMAL PROCESSING DATE
BADGE REPORTED LOST, THEN FOUND182BADGE REPORTED LOST, THEN FOUND. HAND EVALUATED AND EXPOSURE ATTRIBUTED TO CORRECT YEAR
BADGE RETURNED EARLY AND HAND EVALUATED124FILM BADGE RETURNED EARLY AND HAND EVALUATED
BADGE WAS THROWN AWAY BY BADGE WEARER290BADGE WAS THROWN AWAY BY BADGE WEARER
BADGE WAS THROWN AWAY BY BADGE WEARER291BADGE WAS THROWN AWAY BY BADGE WEARER
BADGE WORN ON HEAD. NO BODY BADGE WORN.250BADGE WORN ON HEAD. NO BODY BADGE WORN ON THE EXPOSURE PERIOD
BADGED OFF-SITE AND REPORTED TO LASL119BADGED BY OFF-SITE INSTALLATION AND REPORTED TO LASL - 119 FOLLOWED BY DATE INDICATES THE FIRST DAY WORN
BADGES EXPOSED TO AN UNKNOWN SOURCE277P-2 FILM BADGES WORN MARCH 1978 WERE EXPOSED TO AN UNKNOWN SOURCE. TLD READINGS WERE USED. SEE 4/26/78 MEMO
BADGES RETURNED PRIOR TO SCHEDULED DATE246BADGES RETURNED PRIOR TO SCHEDULED RETURN DATE - SIMILAR TO CODE 046 EXCEPT THAT YEAR AND MONTH FOLLOWS THE ONE APPEARING ON THE CARD AND LISTING. EXAMPLE: ENTRIES D, D, 75 CODE 246 DATE 1/01/76 INDICATES THE BADGE TO BE A JANUARY 1976 ISSUE, RETURNED EARLY AND IN TIME TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DECEMBER 1975 RUN
BELIEVED SPURIOUS. READING SET TO ZERO313NON-PENETRATING, PENETRATING AND/OR NEUTRON READING BELIEVED TO BE SPURIOUS. READING SET EQUAL TO ZERO OR SOME APPROPRIATE POSITIVE READING BASED ON INVESTIGATION
BODY AND HEAD BADGES WORN SIMULTANEOUSLY249BODY AND HEAD BADGES WORN SIMULTANEOUSLY OR ON THE SAME DAY AND THE HIGHER OF THE TWO EXPOSURES WAS ASSIGNED TO THE INDIVIDUAL
BODY BADGE FILM LOST.164BODY BADGE FILM LOST. WRIST BADGE READING WAS ALSO ASSIGNED AS BODY EXPOSURE
BODY BADGE NOT ISSUED.076BODY BADGE NOT ISSUED. CARD PREPARED TO CARRY DATA (BIRTHDAY) FOR WRIST CARD
BODY BADGE WORN AS WRIST BADGE141BODY BADGE WORN AS WRIST BADGE
BRASS DENSITY SET188BRASS DENSITY SET EQUAL TO CADMIUM DENSITY IN ORDER TO PREVENT A SOFT GAMMA EVALUATION
CALCULATED EXPOSURE106CALCULATED EXPOSURE PLUS ALL OR PART OF FILM BADGE INDICATION FOR ACCIDENT 12-30-58
CALCULATED EXPOSURE110CALCULATED EXPOSURE. DID NOT ARRIVE AT SITE UNTIL 4:55 PM 12-30-58
CALCULATED EXPOSURE111CALCULATED EXPOSURE. DID NOT ARRIVE AT SITE UNTIL 4:50 PM 12-30-58
CALCULATED EXPOSURE RECEIVED104CALCULATED EXPOSURE RECEIVED FROM RADIATION EXCURSION ON 12-30-58
CALCULATED NEUTRON EXPOSURE079CALCULATED NEUTRON EXPOSURE
CALCULATED NEUTRON EXPOSURE 7.2 WEEKS.095CALCULATED NEUTRON EXPOSURE 7.2 WEEKS. MEMO DATED 1-21-54
CALIBRATING IN G BUILDING038CALIBRATING IN G BUILDING
CHIP READING IN POSITION 1 IS SET311THE TLD CHIP READING IN POSITION 1 IS GREATER THAN THE CHIP READING 2 BY MORE THAN 15%, A RESULT UNATTAINABLE WITH IONIZING RADIATION. CONSEQUENTLY, THE CHIP READING IN POSITION 1 IS SET EQUAL TO THE CHIP READING IN POSITION 2
CONTAMINATION.273BADGE SHOWED A POSITIVE READING BUT WAS ATTRIBUTED TO CONTAMINATION.
CONTROL FILM ISSUED TO A VISITOR247CONTROL FILM INADVERTENTLY ISSUED TO A VISITOR - DP 4/7/76
DAMAGED DURING DEVELOPMENT011DAMAGED DURING DEVELOPMENT
DAMAGED DURING PERIOD OF ISSUE010DAMAGED DURING PERIOD OF ISSUE (LIGHT STRUCK) (LAUNDRY) ETC.
DATA FOR 51 BADGES WERE LOST360NED BASED ON PAST EXPOSURE HISTORIES OF THE INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED AND WILL BE CODED 360 IN EDBS.
DATA FROM TLDS AND ALBEDO DOSIMETERS219DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM TLDS AND ALBEDO DOSIMETERS (GAMMA & THERMALS - TLDS) - (FAST NEUTRONS - ALBEDO) DATA CONTAINED IN LA NOTEBOOK #17688
DATES APPEARING ON CARD ARE ESTIMATED166ACTUAL DATES THAT THE FILM BADGE WAS WORN ARE UNKNOWN. DATES APPEARING ON IBM CARD ARE ESTIMATED
DATES NOT WITHIN CALENDAR QUARTER131FILM ISSUE AND RETURN DATES DO NOT FALL WITHIN RECORDED CALENDAR QUARTER
DEFECTIVE FILM171DEFECTIVE FILM - SUBMITTED TO EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY IN ROCHESTER, NEW YORK FOR EXAMINATION
DEFECTIVE FILM190DEFECTIVE FILM
DENSITIES BELIEVED FAULTY272DENSITIES ABOVE CONTROL FILM BUT BELIEVED TO BE DUE TO FAULTY X-RAY EQUIPMENT - REDUCED TO ZERO.
DENSITIES IN EXCESS OF 3252DENSITIES IN EXCESS OF 3, EXPOSURE RECORDED TO BE 1.10+. 9/19-10/20/49
DENSITIES INDICATE A GAMMA EXPOSURE115DENSITIES APPEARING ON THIS FILM INDICATE A GAMMA EXPOSURE OF 5.01 REM. HOWEVER, PECULIAR DENSITY PATTERN AND INVESTIGATION DISCLOSED THAT FILM WAS SUBJECTED TO HEAT. REM VALUE HAS BEEN REDUCED TO .40 (.10/WEEK FILM WAS OUT IN FIELD). THIS IS BELIEVED TO MORE CLOSELY APPROXIMATE ACTUAL EXPOSURE RECEIVED BY INDIVIDUAL
DENSITY UNDER THE GAMMA FILTER WAS SET153DUE TO THE SPREADING OF THE OPEN WINDOW DENSITY TO THE GAMMA WINDOW, DENSITY UNDER THE GAMMA FILTER WAS SET EQUAL TO THE GAMMA-THERMAL WINDOW DENSITY
DERMATOLOGICAL/DENTAL X-RAY. NOT EVAL126BADGE EXPOSED DURING DERMATOLOGICAL OR DENTAL X-RAY TREATMENT. NOT EVALUATED
DETAILS ARE IN THE INCIDENT FILE284CALCULATED FAST NEUTRON AND GAMMA EXPOSURES FOR PERSONS AT LAMPF. DETAILS ARE IN THE INCIDENT FILE
DETAILS CONTAINED IN THE INCIDENT FILE262DETAILS OF EXPOSURE ARE CONTAINED IN THE INCIDENT FILE
DETAILS IN INDIVIDUAL'S MEDICAL FOLDER128DETAILS ON THE SPECIAL HANDLING OF THIS BADGE ARE CONTAINED IN INDIVIDUAL'S MEDICAL FOLDER
DISCONTINUED008DISCONTINUED
DO NOT USE - USE 140 INSTEAD193DO NOT USE - USE 140 INSTEAD
DOSAGE ESTIMATED168DOSAGE ESTIMATED FROM KODAK FINE GRAIN POSITIVE FILM RADIATION ASSUMED TO BE HEAVILY FILTERED KVCP X-RAYS. SEE RADIOGRAPHY IN MODERN INDUSTRY, PAGES 120 AND 121
DOSE ASSIGNED GREATER THAN BADGE.326THE DOSE ASSIGNED TO INDIVIDUAL IS GREATER THAN DOSE REGISTERED BY INDIVIDUAL'S BADGE. ADDITIONAL DOSE ADDED AFTER INVESTIGATION OF INCIDENT OR SITUATION BY HSE-1 PERSONNEL. FOR DETAILS, REF, MEMO FOR INDIVIDUAL IN INCIDENT FILE
DOSE ESTIMATE BY COMPARING DENSITIES3621950 RECORD FOR BADGE WEARER'S DOSE ESTIMATE MADE BY COMPARING DENSITIES ON WEARERS FILM WITH OTHER FILMS HAVING SIMILAR DENSITIES. 12/16/93
DUPONT 555 OR KODAK TYPE 2 LOST174DUPONT 555 OR KODAK TYPE 2 LOST DURING PROCESSING. HOWEVER, FINE GRAIN POSITIVE AND NTA FILMS INDICATE NO SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE - 555 FILM LOST BY WEARER
EMPLOYEE WORE BADGE ASSIGNED TO ANOTHER325EMPLOYEE INADVERTENTLY WORE BADGE OR CARD ASSIGNED TO ANOTHER EMPLOYEE. THE EXPOSURES, IF ANY, HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED TO CORRECT EMPLOYEE AND THE DETAIL DATA HAS BEEN CODED. REFERENCE MEMO IN INCIDENT FILE FOR DETAILED EXPLANATION
EMULSION PEELED, PLATE THROWN AWAY023EMULSION PEELED, PLATE THROWN AWAY, NTP BROKEN (WET OR DAMAGED)
EST. FAST NEUTRON EXPOSURE 0.07 TO 7.00067ESTIMATED FAST NEUTRON EXPOSURE 0.07 TO 7.00 REM, FILM BADGE ISSUED, NOT WORN DURING ACCIDENT. OVEREXPOSURE REPORT SENT 7-27
ESTIMATED DOSAGE, FILM BADGE NOT WORN032ESTIMATED DOSAGE, FILM BADGE NOT WORN
ESTIMATED EXTREMITY EXPOSURE MEMO236ESTIMATED EXTREMITY EXPOSURE MEMO IN MEDICAL FOLDER
EVALUATION CHANGED040EVALUATION CHANGED (NEW CALIBRATION CURVE) DP WEST ONLY
EXCESSIVE CONTAMINATION.084FILM BADGE NOT RETURNED DUE TO EXCESSIVE CONTAMINATION. PERSON ATTRIBUTED WITH MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE LEVEL FOR THIS PERIOD OR 0 EXPOSURE
EXPOSED TRITIUM. GAMMA EXP ASSUMED ZERO156BADGE EXPOSED TO TRITIUM - GAMMA EXPOSURE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO
EXPOSURE APPEARS TO BE DUE TO HEAT.237ALL OR PART OF THE REPORTED EXPOSURE APPEARS TO BE DUE TO HEAT. WEARER ATTRIBUTED WITH EXPOSURE. SEE 229
EXPOSURE ASSIGNED345EXPOSURE FOR THIS INDIVIDUAL WAS ASSIGNED AS THE PROGRAM EVALUATED IT, I. E. NO CHANGE. THERE WAS, HOWEVER, AN INVESTIGATION AND DETAILS ARE LOCATED IN THE INCIDENT FILE
EXPOSURE BADGE WHILE NOT ON PERSON.212SEE MEMO IN MEDICAL FOLDER, CONCERNING EXPOSURE FOR FILM BADGE WHILE NOT ON HIS PERSON. FILM EXPOSURE REDUCED TO ESTIMATED EXPOSURE OF .14 GAMMA REM PLUS .14 FAST NEUTRON REM
EXPOSURE BEYOND RANGE121EXPOSURE BEYOND RANGE OF 502, 555 OR KODAK TYPE 2 FILMS
EXPOSURE CALCULATED FOR A COMBINATION066(OBSOLETE) TRITIUM EXPOSURE CALCULATED FOR A COMBINATION OF 7.5 AND 11-DAY HALF-LIFE
EXPOSURE COMBINATION OF X-RAY AND GAMMA036EXPOSURE A COMBINATION OF X-RAY AND GAMMA (SPECIAL CASE)
EXPOSURE DATA LOST195EXPOSURE DATA LOST - TWO DUPONT 555 FILMS IN SOME PACKET
EXPOSURE ESTIMATED BY PLANTING BADGE142EXPOSURE ESTIMATED BY PLANTING A FILM BADGE AND SIMULATING CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH EXPOSURE OCCURRED. A COPY OF THE MEMO EXPLAINING SITUATION IS CONTAINED IN INDIVIDUAL'S MEDICAL FOLDER
EXPOSURE LOST OR NOT ISSUED.033EXPOSURE FROM DOSIMETER, FILM BADGE LOST OR NOT ISSUED. FILM EXPOSURE UNREASONABLE. FILM ACCIDENTALLY EXPOSED
EXPOSURE NOT INCLUDED IN AUGUST 1977 RUN266PERSON'S EXPOSURE NOT INCLUDED IN AUGUST 1977 RUN - CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION 9/20/77
EXPOSURE OF BETWEEN 28 TO 32R.283FILMS CONTAINED WITHIN A BADGE ISSUED JULY 1978 INDICATED AN EXPOSURE OF BETWEEN 28 TO 32R. THE BADGE WAS ACCIDENTALLY EXPOSED AT LAMPF. DETAILS ARE IN THE INCIDENT FILE
EXPOSURE ON FILM NOT RECEIVED BY PERSON227EXPOSURE ON FILM NOT RECEIVED BY PERSON. SEE EXPLANATION OF EXPOSURE ATTACHED TO VISITOR'S CARD AND CORRESPONDING COMPONENT FILM
EXPOSURE ORIGINALLY REPORTED IN ERROR180EXPOSURE ORIGINALLY REPORTED IN ERROR EVM 4 USED INSTEAD OF EVM 7. ERROR HAS BEEN CORRECTED
EXPOSURE PRIOR TO EMPLOYMENT AT LASL139EXPOSURE RECEIVED PRIOR TO EMPLOYMENT AT LASL. SEE INDIVIDUAL'S MEDICAL FOLDER
EXPOSURE QUESTIONABLE169EXPOSURE QUESTIONABLE BUT HAS BEEN GIVEN TO INDIVIDUAL
EXPOSURE RE-EVALUATION FROM EVM1 TO EVM4.244EXPOSURE RE-EVALUATION FROM EVM1 TO EVM4. WEARER'S EXPOSURE WAS PRIMARILY FROM U-233. 2/19/76
EXPOSURE RECEIVED AT NTS IN 1960138EXPOSURE RECEIVED AT NTS IN 1960. HOWEVER, REPORT WAS SUBMITTED TO LASL AFTER THE 1960 RUN WAS COMPLETED. CONSEQUENTLY, THIS EXPOSURE APPEARS WITH 1961 IBM CARD
EXPOSURE RECORDED AFTER DISCUSSION285EXPOSURE RECORDED AFTER DISCUSSION - BACK RECORDS 9/01/78
EXPOSURE REDUCED TO ONE-THIRD037EXPOSURE REDUCED TO ONE-THIRD BECAUSE SOURCE WAS EXPOSED 24 HOURS A DAY AND PERSON WAS CLOSE TO BADGE ONLY 8 HOURS A DAY
EXTREMITY EXPOSURE TO TRITIUM.232EXTREMITY EXPOSURE TO TRITIUM. DOSE ESTIMATED BY TIME MEASUREMENTS ON THE MATERIAL HANDLED. 1/6/74
FACTOR OF (1) APPLIED TO WRIST BADGE102FACTOR OF (1) APPLIED TO WRIST BADGE SINCE BADGE WAS IN, OR NEAR, CONTACT WITH MATERIAL
FEBRUARY EXPOSURE REDUCED TO ZERO.233FEBRUARY EXPOSURE OF 1.03 REM REDUCED TO ZERO. ACCIDENTALLY EXPOSED BADGE WHILE ON LAB COAT. SEE MEMO DATED 4/15/75
FILM ACCIDENTALLY EXPOSED026FILM ACCIDENTALLY EXPOSED, EXPOSURE REDUCED TO TOLERANCE (PACKET CONTAMINATED)
FILM APPEARS EXPOSED TO HEAT229FILM APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO HEAT - SITUATION INVESTIGATED BUT HEAT EFFECTS CANNOT BE CONFIRMED - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNED WITH MEASURED EXPOSURE. SEE 237
FILM BADGE CONTAMINATED167FILM BADGE CONTAMINATED
FILM BADGE LEFT ON OR NEAR SOURCE014FILM BADGE LEFT ON OR NEAR SOURCE (0 EXPOSURE ONLY)
FILM BADGE LOST - EXPOSURE ESTIMATED185FILM BADGE LOST - EXPOSURE ESTIMATED BY INDIVIDUAL OR MEASURED BY POCKET DOSIMETER
FILM BADGE LOST BUT FOUND AGAIN150FILM BADGE LOST BUT FOUND AGAIN AFTER A SECOND BADGE WAS ISSUED. OR SENT TO LAUNDRY BUT NOT RUINED
FILM BADGE LOST BY INDIVIDUAL055FILM BADGE LOST BY INDIVIDUAL
FILM BADGE LOST BY WEARER241FILM BADGE LOST BY WEARER - EXPOSURE ESTIMATED BY H-1 SECTION LEADER OR HEALTH PHYSICIST 9/30/75
FILM BADGE LOST OR MIXED UP243FILM BADGE LOST OR MIXED UP - HOWEVER, ESTIMATE OF EXPOSURE COULD NOT BE MADE BY H-1 PERSONNEL
FILM BADGE NOT WORN.086FILM BADGE NOT WORN. READING DETERMINED FROM BADGES WORN BY LEADERS OF TOUR
FILM BADGE PATTERN UNEXPLAINABLE029FILM BADGE PATTERN UNEXPLAINABLE, ATTRIBUTED WITH ESTIMATED DOSAGE
FILM BADGE PATTERN UNEXPLAINABLE045FILM BADGE PATTERN UNEXPLAINABLE, PERSON ATTRIBUTED MAX-PERM-LEVEL EXPOSURE FOR PERIOD (OR ATTRIBUTED WITH REASONABLE EXPOSURE FOR THAT PERIOD)
FILM BADGES EXPOSED191FILM BADGES IN RACK INADVERTENTLY EXPOSED DURING A FAILURE OF SAFETY DOOR AT P-9
FILM BADGES RETURNED EARLY155FILM BADGES RETURNED EARLY, HAND EVALUATED AND REPORTED. HOWEVER, THE INFORMATION WAS NOT RELAYED TO IBM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME
FILM DAMAGED DURING PROCESSING.255FILM DAMAGED DURING PROCESSING. TLD FINGER RING USED TO ESTIMATE EXPOSURE
FILM DATA LOST240FILM DATA LOST AS A RESULT OF H-1 PROCESSING - EXPOSURE FOR THIS PERIOD ESTIMATED BY H-1 SECTION LEADER OR HEALTH PHYSICIST 9/30/75
FILM EXPOSED TO HEAT AND RADIATION.238FILM WAS EXPOSED TO A COMBINATION OF HEAT AND RADIATION. TLDS WORN WITH BADGE INDICATED THE REPORTED EXPOSURE. MEMO DATED 9/9/75
FILM EXPOSURE TO THERMAL RADIATION.125FILM EXPOSURE TO THERMAL RADIATION. SEE LA NOTEBOOK 4941, PAGE 115, FOR DETAILS - INVESTIGATION CONFIRMS HEAT - INDIVIDUAL GIVEN ZERO EXPOSURE (SEE 242 CODE)
FILM FOUND TO HAVE AN EXPOSURE203INDIVIDUAL PREVIOUSLY REPORTED AS HAVING A ZERO EXPOSURE. SUBSEQUENTLY FILM WAS PROCESSED AND FOUND TO HAVE AN EXPOSURE
FILM HAD AN EXPOSURE OF 40-60 REM.278FILM HAD AN EXPOSURE OF 40-60 REM. BADGE WAS ISSUED JUNE 1977, RETURNED APRIL 1978. BADGE WAS LOST IN RADIATION AREA SHORTLY AFTER ISSUE. SEE MEMO OF 5/16/78
FILM HAND EVALUATED FOR 70 KEV X-RAYS.132FILM HAND EVALUATED FOR 70 KEV X-RAYS. (DETAILS ON BACK OF NET DENSITY WORK FORM)
FILM HAS THE APPEARANCE OF HEAT.306WEARER ZIA CO. MONTH OF JUNE 1979. FILM HAS THE APPEARANCE OF HEAT. WAS ASSIGNED THE POCKET DOSIMETER READINGS OF .11.
FILM IDENTIFIED BY X-RAYED BADGE NUMBER159FILM IDENTIFIED BY X-RAYED BADGE NUMBER PLUS A PENCILED A
FILM IDENTIFIED BY X-RAYED BADGE NUMBER160NOTE: ABOVE TWO CODES DIFFERENTIATE IDENTICAL FILM BADGE NUMBERS WHICH WERE INADVERTENTLY ISSUED AT PAJARITO, 1962
FILM ISSUED TO TWO INDIVIDUALS056FILM ISSUED TO TWO INDIVIDUALS, READING 0.00 R
FILM NOT EVAL DUE TO HIGH FOG DENSITY.235FILM NOT EVALUATED DUE TO HIGH FOG DENSITY. DATE CODE INDICATES MONTH AND DATE OF ISSUE
FILM NOT PROCESSED259FILM NOT PROCESSED - READINGS WILL BE REPORTED ON THE NEXT REPORT
FILM NOT X-RAY IDENTIFIED.231FILM NOT X-RAY IDENTIFIED. THERE IS REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THE ASSIGNED EXPOSURE OF ZERO TO THIS PERSON IS CORRECT
FILM PACKET CONTAMINATED OR LIGHT STRUCK060FILM PACKET CONTAMINATED OR LIGHT STRUCK. FILM READ IN NON- CONTAMINATED AREA
FILM PARTIALLY LIGHT STRUCK, DAMAGED052FILM PARTIALLY LIGHT STRUCK, DAMAGED OR CONTAMINATED. READ ON ANSCO DENSITOMETER
FILM READ ON ANSCO DENSITOMETER220FILM RETURNED EARLY AND READ ON ANSCO DENSITOMETER (ENTER RETURN DATE)
FILM READ SEVERAL MONTHS AFTER RETURN170NOT A STRAGGLER - FILM READ SEVERAL MONTHS AFTER IT'S ACTUAL RETURN OR PROCESSED AFTER IBM RUN WAS MADE
FILM RETURNED EARLY (DATE)046FILM RETURNED EARLY (DATE)
FILM RETURNED LATE AND HAND EVALUATED130FILM RETURNED LATE AND HAND EVALUATED
FILM USED EXPERIMENTALLY093FILM USED EXPERIMENTALLY - EXPOSURE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO INDIVIDUAL
FILM WORN - HAND EVALUATED187FILM WORN - HAND EVALUATED - SEE MEMO IN MEDICAL FOLDER
FILM WORN BY ANOTHER PERSON053FILM WORN BY ANOTHER PERSON DURING THIS PERIOD
FILMS DEVELOPED 78 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT230FILMS INADVERTENTLY DEVELOPED 78 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT INSTEAD OF 68 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. HOWEVER, AN APPROPRIATE CONTROL WAS USED TO SUBTRACT THE FOG DENSITY. 8/5/74
FILTERS MISSING FROM BACK OF BADGE205FILTERS 20 & 21 MISSING FROM BACK OF BADGE. BADGE WORN BACKWARDS. F 20 & 21 DENSITIES SET TO ZERO
FOR PLANTED BADGES, DENSITIES REDUCED148FOR PLANTED BADGES, DENSITIES GREATER THAN 5.000 HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO 4.999 FOR IBM CALCULATION PURPOSES
FRACTION OF TOTAL REM DUE TO NEUTRONS.116(TO BE USED ONLY ON EXPOSURE RECORDS FROM NTS AS OF MARCH, 1959). A NEUTRON FILM WAS WORN BY INDIVIDUAL, CONSEQUENTLY, (UNLESS NEUTRON FILM RECEIVED 0 EXPOSURE) A FRACTION OF TOTAL REM MAY BE DUE TO NEUTRONS.
GAMMA CALCULATED181GAMMA CALCULATED TO BE 3500 R AND 3500 REM, CALCULATED FAST NEUTRONS 900 REM, NO BREAKDOWN ON THERMAL NEUTRONS AND 4400 REM TOTAL EXPOSURE. AVERAGE CALCULATED VALUES TAKEN FROM JOURNAL OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE 3, 3 (SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT, MARCH, 1961). (11 PUNCH IN COLUMNS 50, 51 AND 54, 55 IMPLY A FACTOR OF 100 TIMES THE NUMERICAL DATA IN THESE FIELDS. 11 PUNCHES IN COLUMNS 59 AND 72 IMPLY A FACTOR OF 10 TIMES NUMERICAL DATA IN THESE FIELDS)
GAMMA ENERGY ABOVE 0.2 MEV050GAMMA ENERGY ABOVE 0.2 MEV (CORRECTION FACTOR OF 1, BODY AND WRIST) (RADIUM CURVE) (CO-60)
GAMMA EXPOSURE FROM FILM BADGE105GAMMA EXPOSURE FROM FILM BADGE, NEUTRON EXPOSURE CALCULATED FOR ACCIDENT 12-30-58
GAMMA FROM FILM BADGE 118.0 REM112GAMMA FROM FILM BADGE 118.0 REM, CALCULATED FAST NEUTRON 13.20 REM, CALCULATED THERMALS 2.34 REM. (GAMMA EXPOSURES EXCEEDING 100 R AND REM HAVE BEEN PLACED ON 53 THROUGH 58 SUMMARY CARDS BY USE OF OVER PUNCH)
GAMMA FROM FILM BADGE 125.00 REM113GAMMA FROM FILM BADGE 125.00 REM. NO CALCULATION MADE FOR THERMALS. (GAMMA EXPOSURES EXCEEDING 100 R AND REM HAVE BEEN PLACED ON 53 THROUGH 58 SUMMARY CARDS BY USE OF OVER PUNCHES)
GAMMA READINGS WERE NOT MEASURED269KODAK SUPPLIED TYPE A NEUTRON FILMS CONTAINED WITHIN TYPE 2 BOXES. SOME OF THE TYPE A'S WERE ASSUMED TO BE TYPE 2 AND GAMMA READINGS WERE NOT MEASURED (PRIMARILY ZIA) 1/17/78
GLOWCURVE READINGS LOST363GLOWCURVE READINGS LOST DUE TO COMPUTER MALFUNCTION BUT CHIP READINGS STILL EXIST. RESULTS ANALYZED WITHOUT GLOWCURVE DATA.
HAND EVALUATED186HAND EVALUATED (555) BY EVM 7. BADGE WORN DURING THERAPEUTIC X-RAY TREATMENT. INDIVIDUAL CREDITED WITH THIS EXPOSURE
HAND EVALUATION - NOT FROM 704118HAND EVALUATION - NOT FROM 704
HAND EVALUATION OF FINE GRAIN POSITIVE120HAND EVALUATION OF FINE GRAIN POSITIVE
HIGH SCHOOL HOME-MADE X-RAY MACHINE149HIGH SCHOOL HOME-MADE X-RAY MACHINE
HIGHER OF TWO BADGES WORN SIMULTANEOUSLY092READING IS THE HIGHER OF TWO FILM BADGES WORN SIMULTANEOUSLY
IDENTICAL TO CODE 157 BUT NOT RETURNED158IDENTICAL TO CODE 157 EXCEPT THAT FILM BADGE WAS NOT RETURNED TO THE PEARL HARBOR PHOTODOSIMETRY SECTION
IGNORED UNTIL WE UNDERSTAND THE ENTRIES2861946 BACK RECORDS GAMMA REPORTED, HOWEVER, N UNITS ARE ALSO RECORDED IN THE LA NOTEBOOKS. THEY ARE BEING IGNORED AT THIS TIME UNTIL WE UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF THE ENTRIES 9/07/78
INDICATES AN EXPOSURE VALUE OF .008 REM223INDICATES THAT AN EXPOSURE VALUE OF .008 REM WAS ASSIGNED TO EACH PROTON RECOIL TRACK COUNTED WITHIN AN NTA FILM AREA OF ONE SQUARE MILLIMETER. NTA EXPOSURES WHICH ARE NOT REMARK CODED 223 INDICATE THAT .024 REM/TRACK WAS USED
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNED EXPOSURE183INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNED EXPOSURE AT UPPER RANGE OF FILM, ALTHOUGH CALIBRATION CURVE OF FILM WAS EXCEEDED
INDIVIDUAL DENIES BADGE WAS LOST147INDIVIDUAL DENIES BADGE WAS LOST - WE ARE UNABLE TO ACCOUNT FOR THIS MISSING BADGE
INDIVIDUAL DID NOT RECEIVE FILM BADGE.177INDIVIDUAL STATED THAT HE DID NOT RECEIVE HIS REGULARLY ISSUED FILM BADGE. AS A RESULT, A SECOND FILM BADGE WAS ISSUED. SUBSEQUENTLY, BOTH THE REGULAR AND SECOND BADGE WERE RETURNED BY THE WEARER TO H-1. OUR FILES CONTAIN TWO SETS OF FILMS WITH IDENTICAL BADGE NUMBERS AND ISSUE DATES
INDIVIDUAL HAS TERMINATED175INDIVIDUAL HAS TERMINATED AND IS UNAVAILABLE TO COMMENT ON PECULIAR PATTERNS APPEARING ON HIS FILMS
INDIVIDUAL ON TEMPORARY QUARTERLY BASIS068INDIVIDUAL ON TEMPORARY QUARTERLY BASIS AUTHORIZED BY GROUP OFFICE
INDIVIDUAL TERMINATED OR EXTENDED LEAVE133INDIVIDUAL HAS TERMINATED OR IS ON EXTENDED LEAVE AND ATTEMPTS TO RETRIEVE OUTSTANDING FILM BADGE HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL
INDIVIDUAL WEARING NTA (NEUTRON) BADGE349NTA. THE NEUTRON DOSE, ASSIGNED TO THIS INDIVIDUAL, WAS RECEIVED WHILE THE INDIVIDUAL WAS WEARING AN NTA (NEUTRON) BADGE
INDIVIDUAL'S EXPOSURE UNDER OTHER NAME072INDIVIDUAL'S EXPOSURE CARRIED UNDER ANOTHER NAME AS THE RESULT OF MARRIAGE OR LEGAL NAME CHANGE - CHECK Z-NUMBER
INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE (TRITIUM)051INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE (TRITIUM)
INVESTIGATION REPORT - X-RAY EXPOSURE281INVESTIGATION REPORT - X-RAY EXPOSURE - MAY 17, 1978. DOCUMENT NUMBER HRD 78-1
ISSUE DATE COINCIDES WITH NORMAL127ISSUE DATE DOES COINCIDE WITH NORMAL ISSUE DATE SINCE THIS REPRESENTS THE SECOND BADGE ISSUED DURING THE MONTH
ISSUE DATE WAS YEAR PRIOR TO RETURN DATE140ISSUE DATE WAS IN THE YEAR PRIOR TO THE RETURN DATE. THIS INFORMATION WILL NOT APPEAR ON THE IBM CARDS
ISSUED DURING PROJECT DOMINIC157ISSUED DURING PROJECT DOMINIC TO LASL EMPLOYEES BY PEARL HARBOR NAVAL SHIPYARD
ISSUED NEW CYCOLAC FILM BADGE176THIS PERSON HAS BEEN ISSUED THE NEW CYCOLAC FILM BADGE INSTEAD OF THE BRASS-CADMIUM BADGE
KEPT BADGE(S) IN DESK329INDIVIDUAL KEPT BADGE(S) IN DESK AND DID NOT WEAR IT/THEM. DATA ON BADGES WAS INVALID. FOR ASSIGNED DATA AND FURTHER EXPLANATION, SEE MEMO IN INCIDENT FILE
LANL BADGES WORN OUTSIDE OF LOS ALAMOS331LANL BADGES WORN OUTSIDE OF LOS ALAMOS ON SPECIAL PROJECT. CONTROLS ISSUED WITH BADGES USED TO DETERMINE BACKGROUND SUBTRACTION. MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE MEMO IN INCIDENT FILE
LANL EMPLOYEE RECEIVED EXPOSURE338LANL EMPLOYEE WHO RECEIVED RADIATION EXPOSURE WHILE AT UNC NUCLEAR INDUSTRIES FOR PERIOD 6/24/85-8/28/86
LANL EMPLOYEE RECEIVED EXPOSURE339LANL EMPLOYEE WHO RECEIVED RADIATION EXPOSURE WHILE AT UNC NUCLEAR INDUSTRIES FOR PERIOD 2/10/86-8/28/86
LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER333LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER WHILE AT LLNL FOR PERIOD 5/24/84-3/21/85
LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER334LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER WHILE AT LLNL FOR PERIOD 7/24/84-3/21/85
LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER336LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER WHILE AT LLNL FOR PERIOD 3/1/85-1/22/86
LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER337LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER WHILE A LLNL FOR PERIOD 4/30/85-2/11/86
LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER341LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER WHILE AT LLNL FOR THE PERIOD 4/14/86-9/30/86
LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER342LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER WHILE AT LLNL FOR THE PERIOD 4/1/86-10/10/86
LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER343LANL EMPLOYEE WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETER WHILE AT LLNL FOR THE PERIOD 8/10/87-6/15/88
LANL EMPLOYEES WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETERS327LANL EMPLOYEES WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETERS WHILE AT LLNL FOR PERIOD 8/30/82-6/30/83
LANL EMPLOYEES WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETERS328LANL EMPLOYEES WHO WORE TLD DOSIMETERS WHILE AT LLNL FOR PERIOD 11/2/82-6/30/83
LANL TLD BADGES WORN OUTSIDE THE USA355LANL TLD BADGES WERE TAKEN (WORN) OUTSIDE THE USA WHILE ON TRAVEL. MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE TAKEN CONTROL BADGES. REF. PHOTO DOSIMETRY INCIDENT FILE FOR DETAILS. (JAN 1991)
LASL AND IDAHO FALLS BADGES WORN SIMULT.136THE LASL FILM BADGE ISSUED DURING THIS PERIOD WAS WORN SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH AN IDAHO FALLS BADGE. THE RECORDED EXPOSURES ARE THOSE MEASURED BY THE IDAHO FALLS BADGE. SEE FILE LASL PERSONNEL EXPOSURES RECEIVED AT OTHER INSTALLATIONS
LASL EMPLOYEE BADGED AT NTS BY REYNOLDS161LASL EMPLOYEE BADGED AT NTS BY REYNOLDS ELECTRIC (SEE CODE 204)
LASL FILM BADGE WORN OFF-PROJECT134READING DERIVED FROM LASL FILM BADGE WORN OFF-PROJECT BY AN OFF-SITE EMPLOYEE
LIH FABRICATION EXPOSURE (TRITIUM).073LIH FABRICATION EXPOSURE (TRITIUM). SPECIAL EVALUATION AND COMPUTED FROM MEASURED HANDLING TIME. TAKE 1/7/.45 OF RA EXPOSURE FROM OPEN WINDOW. APPLY 0.5 CORRECTION TO GIVE BODY REM AND 1.0 CORRECTION TO R TO GIVE EXTREMITY REM. THIS IS A SLIGHT OVER-ESTIMATE OF EXPOSURE. FOR BODY FILM BADGES A FACTOR OF 0.5 CORRECTS R TO REM
LONG NAME152SUFFICIENT CARD COLUMNS WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPLETE NAME.
LOS ALAMOS EMPLOYEES ISSUED DOSIMETERS348LOS ALAMOS EMPLOYEE(S) VISITED AND WERE ISSUED DOSIMETERS(S) AT SANDIA LABORATORY OR LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY OR M. I. T.. FOR DOSIMETER ISSUE PERIOD, SEE DETAIL LISTING. MAY ALSO HAVE WHOLE BODY INTERNAL DOSES DETERMINED BY BIOASSAY OR IN-VIVO COUNTING RESULTS
MEMO DATED 12-1-52172MEMO DATED 12-1-52 ACCOUNTS FOR APPARENT HIGH EXPOSURE AND REDUCES RECORDED EXPOSURE TO PERMISSIBLE FOR THE PERIOD
MORE THAT ONE BADGE WAS WORN359MORE THAT ONE BADGE WAS WORN DURING THE SAME DAY OR PERIOD OF ISSUE. THIS CODE APPEARS IN THE 1949 DETAIL REPORT. 5/17/93
MULTIPLE FILTER PATTERNS206NO ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO MEASURE FILM DENSITIES BECAUSE OF MULTIPLE FILTER PATTERNS - REQUESTED THAT PLANTED BADGE BE RELOCATED
NAME APPEARS IN LA NOTEBOOK265NAME APPEARS IN LA NOTEBOOK WITHOUT DENSITIES OR EXPOSURE (BACK RECORDS 1948). 1949, 1947, 1946, 1945. (REF. 078)
NEUTRON CALIBRATIONS INDICATE TLD-600318NEUTRON CALIBRATIONS INDICATE POSITION #3 HAS A TLD-600 AND POSITION #4 HAS A TLD-700. THE NEUTRON DOSE WAS HAND EVALUATED ACCORDINGLY
NEUTRON CALIBRATIONS INDICATE TLD-600319NEUTRON CALIBRATIONS INDICATE TLD-600 IN ONE OR MORE WRONG POSITIONS, OR MAY LACK TLD-600. DOSES EVALUATED ACCORDINGLY
NEUTRON DOSE RE-EVALUATED.335NEUTRON DOSE RE-EVALUATED. EXPOSURE WAS PICKED UP IN AN AREA WHERE DIFFERENT NEUTRON CORRECTION FACTORS REQUIRED. MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE MEMO IN INCIDENT FILE
NEUTRON EXPOSURE REDUCED BY 1/10.296NEUTRON EXPOSURE REDUCED BY 1/10. SEE MEMO DATED 2/15/79
NEUTRON EXPOSURE REDUCED TO 1/4295TLD BADGES, TYPE 1 AND 2, WERE STORED IN RACK NEAR NEUTRON SOURCE FOR NON-WORKING HOURS. ASSUME WORN FOR 1/4 OF TOTAL ELAPSED TIME. NEUTRON EXPOSURE REDUCED TO 1/4 OF INITIAL EVALUATION. SEE MEMO DATED 2/8/79
NEW ISSUE013NEW ISSUE
NO BETA EXPOSURE016NO BETA EXPOSURE
NO EXPOSURE RECORDED ON SHEET078NO EXPOSURE RECORDED ON SHEET. INDIVIDUAL POSSIBLY NOT PRESENT. 5/1/79 1945 AND 1946 RECORDS IN SITES WERE BACKGROUND NO ENTRIES POSTED FOR EXPOSURE-LEFT BLANK WITH CODE.
NO FAST NEUTRON FILM270TYPE B POCKET CONTAINED TWO FINE GRAIN POSITIVE FILMS. NO FAST NEUTRON FILM
NO GAMMA EXPOSURE ENTERED FOR SIGMA PERS309NO GAMMA EXPOSURE ENTERED IN LA NOTEBOOK FOR SIGMA PERSONNEL IN 1950
NO ISSUE048NO ISSUE
NO NTA FILM IN KODAK TYPE B FILM PACKET213NO NTA FILM IN KODAK TYPE B FILM PACKET
NO OER SENT041NO OER SENT, RECOMMENDED THAT DOSAGE NOT EXCEED 1.28 R, 2/21 - 2/25, SPECIAL
NO OVEREXP REPORT. INDIVIDUALS NON-LANL085NO OVEREXPOSURE REPORT SENT SINCE INDIVIDUALS ARE NON-LANL PERSONNEL
NO THERMAL NEUTRON EXPOSURE268INSPECTION OF FILM INDICATES NO THERMAL NEUTRON EXPOSURE
NO THERMAL NEUTRONS083SITUATION INVESTIGATED. NO THERMAL NEUTRONS
NON-LAB EMPLOYEE WORE MORE THAN 1 BADGE356NON-LAB EMPLOYEE WHO WORE MORE THAN 1 TEMP BADGE FOR MORE THAN 1 LAB HOST GROUP FOR SOME EXPOSURE PERIOD
NOT AT SITE AT TIME OF ACCIDENT 12-30-58107NOT AT SITE DURING TIME OF ACCIDENT 12-30-58
NOT BELIEVED TO BE A CORRECT EVALUATION2871945 BACK RECORDS - PERSONS ARE BEING ASSIGNED AN EXPOSURE OF 10R OR HIGHER. THIS IS NOT BELIEVED TO BE A CORRECT EVALUATION - A MEMO APPEARS WITHIN THE LA NOTEBOOK
NOT EVALUATED039NOT EVALUATED. FILM APPEARED AS MONTHS OLD BLANK SHOULD LOOK
NOT ON A MONTHLY SCHEDULE271NOT ON A MONTHLY SCHEDULE - ISSUED FOR ONE-TWO-THREE MONTHS. NOT A STRAGGLER
NOT RETURNED049NOT RETURNED
NOT ROUTINELY ISSUED FILM BADGE064INDIVIDUAL NOT ROUTINELY ISSUED FILM BADGE (EXPECT DURING SPECIAL PROJECTS) (ISSUED IRREGULARLY)
NTA BADGE OR CARD LOST BY WEARER.353NTA BADGE OR CARD LOST BY WEARER. MAY CONTAIN CODE ONLY ESTIMATED EXPOSURE REF. *293
NTA FILM USED TO ESTIMATE GAMMA EXPOSURE135NTA FILM USED TO ESTIMATE GAMMA EXPOSURE (HAND EVALUATION)
NTA REM VALUE RECORDED AS 10.00129NTA REM VALUE RECORDED AS 10.00. HOWEVER, TOO MANY TRACKS ON FILM FOR ACCURATE EVALUATION. EXPOSURE MUST BE ASSUMED IN EXCESS OF 10.00 REM
NTP DISCONTINUED031NTP DISCONTINUED
NTP NOT ISSUED024NTP NOT ISSUED
NTP NOT RETURNED057NTP NOT RETURNED
NTP RETURNED EARLY OR LATE063NTP ISSUED ON FILM DATE BUT RETURNED EARLY OR LATE
NUCLEAR TRACK FILM (PLATE) TOO DARK019NUCLEAR TRACK FILM (PLATE) TOO DARK TO READ OR NOT CLEAR (LIGHT STRUCK) (EXPOSED TO LIGHT) (GAMMA EXPOSURE TOO HIGH)
NUCLEAR TRACK PLATE NOT READ015NUCLEAR TRACK PLATE NOT READ
NUMBER OF OVEREXPOSURE018NUMBER OF OVEREXPOSURE (NUMBER IN GAMMA-R COLUMN)
ONLY AN INSTRUMENT BACKGROUND OBSERVED.317DUE TO MISPLACED CHIP OR INSTRUMENT PROBLEMS, ONLY AN INSTRUMENT BACKGROUND WAS OBSERVED. OTHER CHIPS ON CARD USED TO ARRIVE AT READING WHENEVER POSSIBLE.
ONLY TOTAL REM AS REPORTED TO LASL215ONLY TOTAL REM AS REPORTED TO LASL. AS A RESULT, THE ENTRY IN THE GAMMA REM COLUMNS MAY ALSO INCLUDE FAST NEUTRONS, ETC.
OPEN WINDOW REDUCED TO HIGHEST FILTER216TYPE 2 OPEN WINDOW REDUCED TO HIGHEST FILTER 21 CALIBRATION DENSITY ON FILM EXCEEDS HIGHEST CALIBRATION POINT
OVEREXPOSURE RECEIVED DURING065OVEREXPOSURE RECEIVED DURING PERIOD OF RESTRICTION DUE TO PREVIOUS OVEREXPOSURE. MAY ALSO APPEAR ON RECORDS AS 071. (OVEREXPOSURE REPORT SENT)
OVEREXPOSURE REPORT SENT (DATE)004OVEREXPOSURE REPORT SENT (DATE)
PACKET DAMAGED DURING PERIOD OF ISSUE242PACKET DAMAGED DURING PERIOD OF ISSUE - LIGHT STRUCK, HEAT, WET, ETC. EXPOSURE ESTIMATED BY H-1 SECTION LEADER OR HEALTH PHYSICIST 9/30/85
PECULIAR DENSITY PATTERN ON FILM143PECULIAR DENSITY PATTERN ON FILM - WEARER CONTACTED BUT CANNOT EXPLAIN
PENETRATING ADDED TO NON-PENETRATING347SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORY (ABQ) RADIATION REPORTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE PENETRATING RADIATION IN THE NON-PENETRATING COLUMN AS IS DONE AT LANL. TO BE CONSISTENT, WHEN SANDIA SENDS RADIATION REPORTS TO LANL, THE DOSE IN THE PENETRATING COLUMN WILL BE ADDED TO THE DOSE IN THE NON- PENETRATING COLUMN PRIOR TO BEING ENTERED INTO THE LANL RADIATION DATA BASE. THIS CODE WILL BE ENTERED IN THE DETAIL LISTINGS
PERSON BADGED AT NTS. REPORTED TO LASL204PERSON BADGED AT NTS AND REPORTED TO LASL (MONTH - DAY - YEAR IN REMARKS INDICATE FOURTH QUARTER OF PREVIOUS YEAR)
PERSON WAS GIVEN A ZERO ON THE RECORDS.253PERSON WAS GIVEN A ZERO ON THE RECORDS. PERSON STATED IN THE LA NOTEBOOK THAT 30.7 REM AS APPEARED ON THE NTA FILM WAS NOT A TRUE EXPOSURE. PERSON STATED THAT THERE WAS AN EXCESSIVE NUMBER OF SHORT TRACKS
PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBE EXCESSIVE EXPOSURE322PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBE SATURATED BY EXCESSIVE EXPOSURE. SUCCEEDING BADGES WERE EVALUATED FROM INDIVIDUAL CHIP READING AND RECENT EXPOSURE HISTORY
PLANTED BADGES WORN BY INDIVIDUAL194PLANTED BADGES WORN BY INDIVIDUAL
PLANTED THREE-MONTH BADGE207PLANTED THREE-MONTH BADGE - SEE ISSUE DATE - ACTUAL RETURN DATE WILL FOLLOW REMARK CODE
POSITIVE EXPOSURE WAS RECEIVED.351LANL EMPLOYEE VISITED UNITED KINGDOM ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY WHERE A POSITIVE EXPOSURE WAS RECEIVED. FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION, REFERENCE INCIDENT FILE. 7-10-90
PREVIOUS MONTH FILM BADGE WAS ALSO WORN145FILM BADGE ISSUED FOR THE PREVIOUS MONTH WAS ALSO WORN FOR ITS MONTH (TWO-MONTH PERIOD)
PU CALIBRATION CURVE027PU CALIBRATION CURVE (ONLY FOR UNUSUAL CASES, 0.6 FACTOR FOR BODY, 0.67 FOR WRIST) USE BEFORE 1957
PU CALIBRATION CURVE069PU CALIBRATION CURVE (ONLY FOR UNUSUAL CASES) (0.5 CORRECTION FACTOR, BODY ONLY. NO CORRECTION FACTOR TO WRIST, EXCEPT WRIST TO FINGER RATIO WHEN APPROPRIATE - STARTING FROM 7-1-57 ON)
QUARTERLY BASIS034QUARTERLY BASIS
QUESTIONED BY THE FILM BADGE WEARER222THE EXPOSURE AS REPORTED BY THE H-1 DOSIMETRY SECTION WAS QUESTIONED BY THE FILM BADGE WEARER AS POSSIBLY BEING INCORRECT. THE FILM WAS RE-READ AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE ORIGINAL READING WAS ERRONEOUS. THE REPORTED READING HAS BEEN CORRECTED
RADIATION EXPOSURE RECEIVED ON BADGES103RADIATION EXPOSURE AS RECEIVED ON FILM BADGES ISSUED ON 12-22-58 AND RETURNED ON THE EVENING OF 12-30-58, INCLUDED EXPOSURE, IF ANY, RECEIVED DURING RADIATION EXCURSION ON 12- 30-58
RADIUM EXPOSURE, NO BETA (RA EXPOSURE)043RADIUM EXPOSURE, NO BETA (RA EXPOSURE)
RATIOS DID NOT MATCH330(STARTED RATIO CALCULATIONS 1-1-85) THE CHIP 2/CHIP 1 AND CHIP 2/CHIP 3 RATIOS DID NOT MATCH AN IDENTIFIABLE RADIATION SOURCE OR WERE LESS THAN 30 MR AS PER THE RATIO CALCULATING PROGRAM, SO CALCULATIONS WERE DONE MANUALLY. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, REF. INCIDENT FILE. MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE MEMO
RE-HIRED OR PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FILM BADGE062INDIVIDUAL RE-HIRED OR PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FILM BADGE (RE-ISSUE)
RE-ISSUE (ORIGINAL LOST OR CONTAMINATED)020RE-ISSUE (ORIGINAL LOST (ORIGINAL CONTAMINATED)
READ ON ANSCO MCBETH (WESTON)059READ ON ANSCO MCBETH (WESTON)
READING ADDED TO FORMER PERIODS.058READING OF THIS PERIOD ADDED TO FORMER PERIODS. READING TO FORM A TWO-WEEK SPAN FOR OVEREXPOSURE
READINGS ADJUSTED221FILM BADGE READINGS ADJUSTED TO COINCIDE WITH DATA OBTAINED FROM TLDS
READINGS CHANGED TO REASONABLE EXPOSURE340READINGS ON ONE OR MORE CHIPS DETERMINED TO BE SPURIOUS BY GLOW CURVE ANALYSIS. READINGS CHANGED TO REFLECT REASONABLE OR APPROPRIATE EXPOSURE AS PER OTHER READINGS AND/OR INVESTIGATION
RECEIVED REPORTABLE EXPOSURE DOCUMENTED289EXPOSURE OF .04 REM NEUTRON AND .01 BETA NOT ATTRIBUTED TO TLD BADGE WEARER. BADGE WAS CARRIED AROUND BY WEARER WHO RECEIVED REPORTABLE EXPOSURE THAT IS DOCUMENTED IN OUR RECORDS. (MP-DO VISITOR)
REDUCED TO TOLERANCE, SEE MEMO042REDUCED TO TOLERANCE, SEE MEMO, EXPLANATION OF EXCESSIVELY EXPOSED FILM BADGE, 6-22-56 - SPECIAL
REFER TO MEMO DATED 9-18-58.099REFER TO MEMO DATED 9-18-58. MEMO IS CONTAINED IN EACH INDIVIDUAL'S MEDICAL FOLDER
REFERENCE LANB #1640 FOR EXPLANATION282ONLY NAMES APPEAR IN LANB #1640 AND REFERENCE IS MADE TO LANB #1864 WHERE NAMES, EXPOSURES, AND DATES APPEAR. REF. LANB #1640 FOR EXPLANATION
REFERENCE MADE TO MEMO DATED 8/25/48279DATA ENTERED IN MEDICAL RECORD OF INDIVIDUALS ARE THE NET DENSITIES, AND REFERENCE IS MADE TO MEMO DATED 8/25/48 (WHICH WAS NOT IN THE INDIVIDUAL'S MEDICAL RECORD AND CANNOT BE LOCATED.) DATA ENTERED ON THIS RECORD IS THE GAMMA-REM (ONLY) TAKEN FROM THE CALIBRATION CURVE FOR DATA LANB 2182, P. 94-95, FOR THE AREA UNDER THE 'ENDS' OF THE FILM (LEAD FOIL ON BOTH SIDES OF FILM). AS EVIDENCED FROM THE CORNER READINGS, THE NONPENETRATING X-RAY EXPOSURE WAS MUCH LARGER, PROBABLY IN THE 1-4 ROETGEN RANGE, BASED ON MEMO M-1200, DATED 10/25/44, IN THE PHOTO-DOSIMETRY EVALUATION BOOK
REGULAR BADGE ISSUED BUT NOT WORN114REGULAR BADGE ISSUED BUT NOT WORN
REGULAR BADGE RETURNED EARLY OR LOST189REGULAR BADGE RETURNED EARLY OR LOST - VISITOR'S BADGE ISSUED TO COVER REMAINDER OF MONTH (NOT RETURNED)
REPRESENTS A TOTAL OF TWO EXPOSURES082THIS REPRESENTS A TOTAL OF TWO EXPOSURES
REPRESENTS AVERAGE OF FOUR FILM BADGES.091THIS EXPOSURE REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE OF FOUR FILM BADGES. TWO FILM BADGES WERE WORN SIMULTANEOUSLY FOR TWO RUNS THROUGH NTS CLOUD
REQUIRES HAND EVALUATION DENSITY 75.00144REQUIRES HAND EVALUATION DENSITY 75.00 (DUPONT 555 COMPONENT)
RESULTS CHANGED TO ZERO358RESULTS CHANGED TO ZERO DUE TO EDBS ROUNDING NET CORRECTED READINGS BETWEEN 9.5 AND 9.9 TO 10.0. THIS CODE IS APPLICABLE TO NOV. 1991 ISSUE DOSIMETERS ONLY AS THE EDBS HAS BEEN MODIFIED NOT TO ROUND NET CORRECTED READINGS < 10 MR
RESULTS MODIFIED USING UPDATED ICCF.361RESULTS MODIFIED USING UPDATED (REGENERATED) ICCF.
RETURNED TO BRASS-CADMIUM BADGE165BECAUSE OF THE LIMITED NUMBER OF THE NEW CYCOLAC BADGES AND IN ORDER THAT OTHERS COULD PARTICIPATE IN THE TESTING PROGRAM, THIS PERSON WAS RETURNED TO THE WEARING OF THE BRASS-CADMIUM BADGE
RING-PU-EXPOSURES DOUBLED FOR NEUTRONS3005/1/79 FROM TLD FINGER RING-PU-EXPOSURES HAVE BEEN DOUBLED TO ACCOUNT FOR NEUTRONS
SECOND FILM BADGE ISSUED DURING MONTH154SECOND FILM BADGE ISSUED DURING THE MONTH
SEE 065071SEE 065
SEE 087080SEE 087
SEE INCIDENT FILE FOR DETAILS261MONTHS AFTER REPORTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO ERDA VISITOR CARDS WERE FOUND WITHOUT FILMS. EXPOSURE IS BASED ON ESCORT READING. SEE INCIDENT FILE FOR DETAILS
SEE MEMO310SEE MEMO
SEE MEMO321THE INDICATED EXPOSURE IS NOT THAT BELIEVED TO BE RECEIVED BY WEARER. FOR EXPLANATION OF RECORDED EXPOSURE, SEE MEMO IN INCIDENT FILE. USED WHEN CARD HAD A PREVIOUS HIGH EXPOSURE AND WE SAW RESIDUAL. ALSO USED WHEN INDIVIDUAL UNDERWENT MEDICAL THERAPY OR AIRPORT X-RAY UNITS AT AIRPORTS & JURY ROOMS
SEE MEMO DATED 7-15-53.100SEE MEMO DATED 7-15-53. MEMO IS ATTACHED TO IBM SUMMARY CARD
SEE MEMO DATED 8/27/76257SEE MEMO DATED 8/27/76 TA-48 FILM BADGE EXPOSURE INVESTIGATION. MEMO IS IN THE INVESTIGATION FILES
SEE MEMO DATED FEB. 12, 1979292SEE MEMO DATED FEB. 12, 1979
SPECIAL BETA EVALUATION087SPECIAL BETA EVALUATION - NOT NORMALLY RECEIVED BY THESE PEOPLE
SPECIAL BETA EVALUATION088SPECIAL BETA EVALUATION - RETURNED LATE (OR FACTOR OTHER THAN 1.00 APPLIED IF BETA ENERGY IS KNOWN)
SPECIAL EVALUATION BY HEALTH PHYSICIST028SPECIAL EVALUATION BY HEALTH PHYSICIST (QUEER FILM, FILM QUEER CREDITED WITH HIGHEST NON-QUEER EXPOSURE FOR PERIOD. EVALUATED UNDER BRASS FOR GAMMA - NO THERMALS) (EVALUATION FOR BETA ONLY)
SPECIAL FISSION PRODUCT PLUTONIUM EVAL173SPECIAL FISSION PRODUCT PLUTONIUM EVALUATION FOR DP PERSONNEL. USING BRASS-CADIUM BADGE HARD GAMMA EVALUATED IN STANDARD MANNER INDICATED BETA MULTIPLIED BY 0.16 TO CONVERT TO PLUTONIUM X-RAY ROENTGEN AND ADDED TO HARD GAMMA
SPECIAL ISSUE022SPECIAL ISSUE
SPECIAL ISSUE AT DP209SPECIAL ISSUE AT DP - REMARK DATE IS RETURN DATE - ISSUE DATE APPEARS ON WORK SHEET
SPECIAL REMARK CODE254SPECIAL REMARK CODE: 46/nCi/1 ON 6/16 ESTIMATED FROM SAMPLES ON 6/23, 6/25 AND 6/28/76. SEE OCCURRENCE REPORT INCIDENT
SPECIAL THERMAL NEUTRON EVALUATION077SPECIAL THERMAL NEUTRON EVALUATION
SPECIAL TLD BADGES ARE ISSUED AT TA-55354SPECIAL TLD BADGES ARE ISSUED AT TA-55 AND ARE CALLED VAULT WORKERS BADGES. THESE (16 + 1 CONTROL) BADGES ARE WORN BY CERTAIN EMPLOYEES DURING SPECIAL VAULT WORK. THE VAULT WORKER BADGE AND THE REGULAR ISSUE BADGE WERE INADVERTENTLY SWITCHED SO THE READINGS FROM THE RESPECTIVE VAULT WORKER TLD BADGE WERE ASSIGNED TO THE PERSON WHO WORE IT. FOR DETAIL EXPLANATION REF. PHOTO DOSIMETRY INCIDENT FILE.
SPECIAL TRANSPORT081SPECIAL TRANSPORT
STANDARD ADJUSTMENT MADE162STANDARD ADJUSTMENT MADE FOR ATTRIBUTING EXPOSURE RECEIVED IN QUARTER JUST ENDED TO THAT QUARTER. THAT IS, PARTIAL BODY BURDEN REMAINING AT END OF QUARTER WAS TREATED AS AN INITIAL EXPOSURE FOR FOLLOWING QUARTER AFTER IT HAD BEEN SUBTRACTED FROM ENDING QUARTER
STANDARD CONTROL FILM NOT APPROPRIATE245THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT THE STANDARD CONTROL FILM IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THIS FILM. (THE PERSONNEL FILM WAS SUSPECTED OF BEING EXPOSED TO HEAT.) A MORE APPROPRIATE CONTROL WAS USED
STORED NEAR RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS224THE FILM BADGE ISSUED TO THIS PERSON WAS INADVERTENTLY STORED IN THE VICINITY OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS. THE EXPOSURE AS ASSIGNED IS CALCULATED AND NOT THE DOSE INDICATED BY THE FILM BADGE. SEE MEMORANDUM DATED MAY 10, 1974, FILM BADGE INVESTIGATION. A COPY OF THIS MEMO APPEARS IN THE INDIVIDUAL'S MEDICAL FOLDER
STRAGGLER, FILM RETURNED (DATE).001STRAGGLER, FILM RETURNED (DATE). ALSO FOR FILMS (GAMMA AND NTA) RETURNED ON TIME BUT READ AT A LATER DATE.
SUMMER STUDENT184SUMMER STUDENT
TEMPORARY CYCOLAC ISSUE.179TEMPORARY CYCOLAC ISSUE. PERSON NORMALLY ISSUED BRASS- CADIUM BADGE
TERMINATED OR DECEASED007TERMINATED OR DECEASED
THREE BADGES WORN218THREE BADGES WORN
THREE BADGES WORN ON TOUR332THREE BADGES WORN ON TOUR AT TA-53 COULD NOT IDENTIFY WEARER OF BADGES.
TLD BADGE CONTAMINATED AND REMOVED299TLD BADGE CONTAMINATED AND REMOVED AFTER ONE WEEK. EXPOSURE FOR FOLLOWING THREE WEEKS OBTAINED FROM TLD DISCS: SEE MEMO 4/5/79
TLD BADGE HAND EVALUATED BUT LEFT OUT3503-13-90 REF. OCT 89 TLD BADGE WAS HAND EVALUATED BUT THE DATA WAS INADVERTENTLY LEFT OUT OF THE RECORDS. REF. MEMO IN INCIDENT FILE FOR DETAILED EXPLANATION. ERROR HAS BEEN CORRECTED AND CODED
TLD BADGE LEFT IN DESK WITH TUBALLOY308TLD BADGE LEFT IN DESK WITH SHEET OF TUBALLOY OR OTHER SOURCE. SEE MEMO IN FILE. PENETRATING AND NONPENETRATING SET EQUAL TO ZERO
TLD BADGE LOST OR CONTAMINATED.323TLD BADGE LOST OR CONTAMINATED. RECORDED EXPOSURE WAS ESTIMATED BY WEARER OR HSE-1, HSE-10 OR HSE-11. SEE DETAILS IN INCIDENT FILE.
TLD BADGE TYPE 1 & 2274TLD BADGE TYPE 1 & 2
TLD BADGE TYPE 3 & 4 LAMPF275TLD BADGE TYPE 3 & 4 LAMPF
TLD BADGE TYPE 5 & 6 PU OPERATIONS276TLD BADGE TYPE 5 & 6 PU OPERATIONS
TLD BADGE TYPE CHANGED FOR PLUTONIUM303TLD BADGE TYPE CHANGED FOR PLUTONIUM EVALUATION
TLD CARD CAME IN DAMAGED346TLD CARD CAME IN DAMAGED. UNABLE TO READ. ASSIGNED EXPOSURE BASED ON PAST EXPOSURE HISTORY, MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE MEMO
TLD CARD FOUND DIRTY AND/OR GREASY.312TLD CARD CHECKED AND FOUND DIRTY AND/OR GREASY. UNUSUAL READINGS BELIEVED TO BE SPURIOUS. ASSIGNED ZERO OR POSITIVE EXPOSURE BASED ON PAST HISTORY. MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE MEMO.
TLD CARD NOT RETURNED.298TLD CARD NOT RETURNED. NON-PENETRATING DOSE READ WITH INDIVIDUAL TLD
TLD CARD OR BADGE LOST BY WEARER293TLD CARD OR BADGE LOST BY WEARER, ONLY CODE ENTERED ON RECORDS
TLD CHIPS LOST FROM TLD CARD.324ONE OR MORE TLD CHIPS LOST FROM TLD CARD. DOSE ASSIGNED BASED ON PAST HISTORY, OTHER CHIP READINGS, H-1 ESTIMATE OR POCKET-CHAMBER READINGS.
TLD READINGS LOST IN THE 2276 TLD READER304ALL OR PART OF TLD READINGS WERE LOST IN THE 2276 TLD READER. THE ASSIGNED DOSES TO THE INDIVIDUAL WERE TAKEN FROM A POCKET DOSIMETER OR TLD WHEN ONE WAS WORN, DOSE MAY ALSO BE ASSIGNED BASED ON THE AREA WHERE BADGE WAS WORN OR INDIVIDUAL'S PAST EXPOSURE HISTORY. MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE MEMO IN INCIDENT FILE
TOTAL EXPOSURE OF TWO OR MORE BADGES094READING REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPOSURE OF TWO OR MORE FILM BADGES
TOTAL NUMBER OF BADGES RETURNED LATE101TOTAL NUMBER OF FILM BADGES RETURNED LATE DURING QUARTER YEAR (NEVER USED) INDICATED SUMMARY CARD
TOUR315TOUR (DATE OF TOUR), COULD ALSO APPLY TO REGULAR BADGE USED AS TOUR BADGE
TOUR CONDUCTED BY PUB-2 (DATE OF TOUR)210TOUR CONDUCTED BY PUB-2 (DATE OF TOUR)
TOUR LEADER.090PERSON WEARING THIS BADGE WAS A TOUR LEADER. THIS EXPOSURE REPRESENTS PROBABLE EXPOSURE TO ALL INDIVIDUALS IN HIS CUSTODY
TRANSFERRED GROUP, DIVISION, ORG009TRANSFERRED GROUP, DIVISION, ORGANIZATION
TRAVEL003TRAVEL
TRITIUM SAMPLE LOST061TRITIUM SAMPLE LOST
TWO OF SAME TYPE FILMS PLACED IN BADGE217DUE TO THE SIMILARITY OF THE KODAK TYPE 2 AND TYPE B FILMS, TWO OF THE SAME TYPE FILMS WERE PLACED IN THE BADGE
U-233 EXPOSURE (CORRECTION FACTOR OF 1)017U-233 EXPOSURE (CORRECTION FACTOR OF 1)
U233 EXPOSURE PRIOR TO ACCIDENT 12-30-58108U-233 EXPOSURE PRIOR TO ACCIDENT 12-30-58. NOT AT SITE AT TIME OF ACCIDENT
U233 EXPOSURE PRIOR TO ACCIDENT 12-30-58109U-233 EXPOSURE PRIOR TO ACCIDENT 12-30-58. ALL EXPOSURE ON FILM BADGE IS REPORTED
UNDER INVESTIGATION267UNDER INVESTIGATION - NOT INCLUDED IN RUN
UNFILTERED FILM EVALUATED FOR PU089UNFILTERED SECTION OF FILM EVALUATED FOR PU. BRASS AND CD AREAS NOT EVALUATED DUE TO SAFELIGHT FOGGING (CMB-11 AND SD-1 GROUPS, 11-11-57 TO 11-18-57)
UNUSED021UNUSED
USED AS A REGULAR CARD320A TLD CARD NORMALLY USED AS A STANDARD (EXPOSED TO 200 MREM) WAS INADVERTENTLY USED AS A REGULAR CARD IN THE SAME MONTH. RESULTING IN A FALSE READING ATTRIBUTED TO THE INDIVIDUAL WEARING CARD
USED AS BLANK025USED AS BLANK
USED FILM ISSUED TO ANOTHER PERSON054USED FILM ISSUED TO ANOTHER PERSON DURING THIS PERIOD
USED FOR BLACK AND WHITE CYCOLAC BADGES225USED FOR BLACK AND WHITE CYCOLAC BADGES ISSUED TO LAMPF- CONNECTED PERSONNEL. FOUR RANDOM NTA FILM FIELDS EXAMINED FOR TRACKS - NONE FOUND - REM DOSE OF ZERO NOT ENTERED ON WORK SHEET OR IBM DETAIL CARD
VACATION OR SICK LEAVE OR LEAVE002VACATION OR SICK LEAVE OR LEAVE (MUST COVER ENTIRE PERIOD)
VISITOR'S BADGE - GAMMA DOSE ZERO208VISITOR'S BADGE - GAMMA DOSE ZERO - FILM ATTACHED TO VISITOR'S REGISTER CARD
WE CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR MISSING BADGE260PERSON ISSUED BADGE STATES THAT BADGE WAS RETURNED VIA INTER-OFFICE MAIL - MAIL ENVELOPE WAS DAMAGED. WE CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR MISSING BADGE
WEARER LEFT BADGE NEAR RADIATION SOURCE.297WEARER LEFT BADGE NEAR RADIATION SOURCE. SEE MEMO DATED 2/16/79
WEARER LOST TLD BADGE THEN FOUND IN PAN301WEARER LOST TLD BADGE THEN FOUND IN PAN CONTAINING U-238 CHIPS - MARCH 1979. ISSUED-EXPOSURE REDUCED TO ZERO - SEE MEMO DATED 5/8/79 CONTAINED IN H.P. INVESTIGATION FILE
WIRES ON LOGIC BOARDS CROSSED352PRIOR TO THE TLD READINGS OF APRIL 12, 15, 16, 1991 (ON SYSTEM 4), THE WIRES ON THE PMT AND LOGIC BOARDS ON POSITIONS 1 AND 4, HAD INADVERTENTLY BEEN CROSSED. THE READINGS FOR THESE 3 DAYS INVOLVED APPROXIMATELY 650 VISITOR BADGES WORN DURING THE MONTH OF MARCH 1991. THE DATA FOR POSITIONS 1 AND 4 WERE CORRECTED AND THE DETAIL LISTING WERE CODED. FOR A DETAILED EXPLANATION SEE PAGE 131 OF THE SYSTEM 4 LOG BOOK
WORN 2-7-57 ONLY047WORN 2-7-57 ONLY, WORE KEEPIN'S REGULAR ISSUE 1031 TO 2/13/57, SPECIAL
WORN BY LANL EMPLOYEES AT ROCKY FLATS344LANL TEMP. TLD BADGES WERE WORN BY LANL EMPLOYEES AT ROCKY FLATS. THE BADGES WERE EVALUATED USING A 0.5 NCF AND THE DOSES ASSIGNED TO THE INDIVIDUALS. AWAY WILL BE ENTERED IN THE REMARK COL. OF FORM RV-12. ROCKY FLATS WILL NOT SEND EXPOSURE INFORMATION TO LANL FOR THESE INDIVIDUALS. SEE INCIDENT FILE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
WORN BY LANL PERS DURING OPER DOMINIC163FILMS WORN BY LANL PERSONNEL DURING OPERATION DOMINIC, 1962. BADGES WERE ISSUED AND PROCESSED BY JTF-8
WRIST BADGE USED AS BODY BADGE122WRIST BADGE USED AS BODY BADGE
WRIST BADGE USED AS PLANTED BADGE123WRIST BADGE USED AS PLANTED BADGE
WRIST BADGE WORN INCORRECTLY151WRIST BADGE WORN INCORRECTLY. FOR EXAMPLE, ATTACHED TO BODY BADGE DURING PERIOD OF ISSUE. FILM NOT EVALUATED
X-RAY ACCIDENT. SEE INCIDENT FILE.294X-RAY ACCIDENT. SEE INCIDENT FILE. TLD READING WAS MULTIPLIED BY EMPIRICALLY DETERMINED FACTOR OF 3.2
X-RAY CURVE006X-RAY CURVE (APPLIED CORRECTION FACTOR OF 0.6 FOR BODY, 0.67 FOR WRIST) (X-RAY EXPOSURE) (X-RAY) (NOT READ DUE TO PECULIARITY OF CD EXPOSURE) USE BEFORE 1957
X-RAY CURVE070X-RAY CURVE (APPLIED CORRECTION FACTOR FOR BODY ONLY OF 0.5, STARTING FROM 7-1-57)
X-RAY DATE ON FILE (DATE)012X-RAY DATE ON FILE (DATE) (SAME AS X-RAYED FOR)
YEAR PUNCHED FOR RETURN DATE INCORRECT117YEAR PUNCHED FOR RETURN DATE IS INCORRECT BUT BECAUSE OF IBM ACCOUNTING IDIOSYNCRASIES, THE YEAR PRIOR TO THE YEAR IN WHICH THE FILM BADGE WAS RETURNED HAD TO BE PUNCHED IN THE CARD. THIS CODE WAS APPLIED WHEN NECESSARY TO PUNCH THE YEAR SUBSEQUENT TO THE SCHEDULED RETURN DATE
To Top
ORISE

The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) is managed by Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Files are built in .CSV and .XLSX formats for use in Excel. Bibliographies are in Adobe Reader .PDF format - Privacy/Security Notice